Thursday, October 29, 2009

A Canary in a Coal Mine?

Life for a canary in a coal mine could be described in three words - short but useful.

Early coal mines did not feature modern ventilation systems, so miners would bring a caged canary into new coal tunnels. Canaries are very sensitive to methane and carbon monoxide, making them ideal for detecting dangerous gases.

As long as the canary kept singing, the miners knew their air supply was breathable. A dead canary signalled an immediate evacuation.

Recently, I read an article by David Handelsman in Applied Clinical Trials, titled, "A Digital Canary in a Coal Mine?", October 2009 and found the implications fascinating. You can read it (here) but I'm going to try to summarize it for you.

Mr. Handelsman's premise is that as people grow more comfortable with blogs, Facebook, and Twitter (called social media), public comment regarding medical situations will get both more readily available and more inaccurate.

His initial thoughts focused on "text mining" social media to identify very early potential health warning signals. He notes that the speed with which news of the H1N1 influenza virus (swine flu) spread had more to do with social media than for any other reason.

As recently as just one or two years ago, news of the virus would have appeared first on mainstream news sites, followed by emails to friends and family referencing the news. Today, friend networks, blog feeds, tweets, and other messages spread news of the potential flu pandemic via its own "cyber" pandemic.

He claims that there is useful content within social media. For example, the HPV vaccine was approved for use in the spring of 2006. Shortly thereafter, the recipients of the vaccine (primarily teenagers) began documenting their experiences online through various, often personal, social media outlets.

That information, because it was delivered through social media outlets, was available virtually immediately to not only individual readers but also computerized systems that can gather, interpret and analyze this content. Big brother may well be watching you right this very minute!

Today, Drug safety is dependent on an Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-regulated spontaneous adverse event reporting procedure. Various medical clinics, hospitals, doctor's offices gather information and enter it into databases on their own computer systems where eventually it reaches the FDA. None of these various databases are available in real time and furthermore systems such as these are privately-held and subject to privacy regulations.

There is really no doubt that these data sources are extensive and provide the most accurate and comprehensive data to identify true safety signals, but they are very slow in signalling an alarm. The true early warning system lies in the ability to mine and analyze the real-time data available through social media.

To see how this might work, let's look into a potentially very real future, where a new, virulent, flu virus is spreading rapidly, and a new vaccine has been distributed.

It is easy to imagine clinics administering vaccinations around the clock, but how can the success or failure of those efforts be rapidly determined?

Certainly, government officials will look to selected caregivers to report flu-related clinic visits, but even that information will take time to aggregate and review.

Instead, imagine Twitter being used to give an indication about the number of flu patients seen and vaccinated. That information, however inaccurate, is available within minutes. Thus it might be the early warning system that indicates success or failure, and enables health officials to quickly take the most appropriate next steps.

Social media is rapidly evolving, and it is unclear exactly what role it will, or should, play regarding health care and many other, yet unthought about, uses.

What is clear is that social media will play a role in the future. We might embrace it as a digital canary in a coal mine, alerting us to possible problems long before we can detect them ourselves.

How's that for food for thought - you Facebook and Tweeter types?

18 comments:

Martha@A Sense of Humor is Essential said...

Great post, I.G. I work as a telecommuting RN case manager and check in with some of my patient's blogs where they update their medical condition. FB has support groups for chronic diseases, research, clinicians, etc.
It's the tip of the iceberg, quite a paradigm shift.
Thank you.

Anonymous said...

I don't do facebook or tweet but that is a very interesting read there Iggy thanks HUGS

Deanna said...

Tweet tweet.

Actually I don't Twitter, and even Facebook is something I don't use a lot. It is very easy to get inaccurate information on the internet. I've often cautioned my loved ones to beware and only listen to trusted sites. However, we aren't dealing with just google anymore. The information is everywhere and much of it is inaccurate. It will be interesting to see how it continues to develop and is put to good use.

You've given this already overloaded brain a lot to think about.

jmt said...

I do FB, but only for social purposes, I use no techno social site for news. Heck, I barely watch news on TV or read it on the websites. I like to think FB was created for picture sharing and to figure out what to grab for a late night snack when all my women friends post about ice cream or popcorn or something.

AliceKay said...

I've read about the canary in the coal mine testing before. I live in a coal mining area of Pennsylvania.

This certainly is food for thought, my friend.

Jess said...

Hmm. Much as I use facebook, the volume of (useless) information would be so vast if you were trying to use it for actual surveys to see the effect of medical treatments. Also, I'm sure there would be privacy issues, since with facebook your profiles and information are essentially private.
On the other hand, if you could design an app to do the job of finding the information, the user has to click 'allow' which gets rid of the privacy issues, and although it wouldn't be as quick as a couple of minutes, the information could be more reliable.
Maybe, maybe.

On a side note, I used to be afraid of sleeping with my door shut in case some carbon monoxide got into my bedroom and I died becuase there was no ventilation. :S Strange child.

PictureGirl said...

Great post as usual. You definitely have a wide range of good items to write about.

Grand Pooba said...

Thank you! Now I can tell me husband that I FB and Tweet for health purposes!

Brilliant.

Karla said...

Thinks about this..yes, some people do tend to "look up symptoms and diagnose" what is wrong. I however trust only one person with my health issues and he's my doctor. He has the knowledge and training to deal with my chronic matters. But yes..food for thought.
*goes back to facebook to play my games*

Martha said...

Very well written, and yes something to think about. News travels fast in Twitter land! I do both Twitter and FB, and blog too (obviously).

I have heard many "breaking news" stories on Twitter before I heard them from other sources!

betty said...

I can see the pros and cons of this; pro since you can get a lot of information out there fast, con with if the information is not correct, it can cause major panic or potential risks with people's health. Case point, years ago when my mom was a young woman, she was in a theater where there was a fire in the movie (not theater, but acted out in movie). A patron yelled "fire" because it was in the movie but people panicked and thought the theater was on fire and stampeded to the doors. No one got seriously hurt, but there were injuries.Something similar could happen here if wrong/incorrect information is given.

I don't FB or Tweet (heck, I hardly even blog these days :)

I didn't like the openness of FB, don't like that much info on me in cyberspace and I could never get into Twitter.

insightful post :)

betty

yellowdoggranny said...

great post..i have a tweet account, but never use it...who cares what i do every 3 minutes? not me..

AiringMyLaundry said...

Very cool.

I Facebook AND Twitter. Or tweet. I guess that's the correct term.

Anonymous said...

Great post... Definately something to think about!

Rita said...

I can see things changing a lot with the swiftness of cyber information. I have heard things online first many times. I think it depends a lot on who you choose to follow or become a fan of. I follow a local news station, Anderson Cooper--and you can follow CNN, etc. There are a lot of different spots out there. That's why I love the web. It is just like people in your town--you get the good, bad, and the ugly. So you choose who you want to associate with--hehe!

On both FB and T--if you like thinking about or discussing the big questions there's always Soul Pancake. Strange sometimes disturbing short stories--VeryShortStory. Or just irreverant, blue, usually humorous statements there's Sh*tMyDadSays on Twitter.

I seldom write anything--mostly a reader--hehe! But I think the possibilities are endless with the Internet. I think we have just seen the tip of the iceberg and there are great things to come. :) Thanks Iggy!!

Anonymous said...

How true. I seriously hear about all the latest current events on blogs or facebook before I even have a chance to turn on the news.

LadyStyx said...

Methane....the canary would never last in this house, especially after burrito night.

Interesting read....for sure.

Pamela said...

Like playing a game of Electronic gossip.